A Discourse Analysis on The Theoretical Value of Illichian Discourse

Keywords: critical theory, Illichian discourse, discourse analysis

Abstract

In this article, Ivan Illich's corpus has been examined in accordance with the critical discourse analysis technique and it has been found that his systematic criticisms of modern social institutions constitute a unique sociological discourse. The main purpose of this analysis is to propose Illich's discourse among contemporary sociological theories through a broader study. The special importance of such a proposal is that it will contribute relatively to the science of sociology, which has been criticized for "not developing theory". The main data source of this analysis is 12 books written by Ivan Illich. The context of this analysis is Ivan Illich's biography and intellectual interactions. The theoretical framework of the study consists of the concepts and propositions developed by the Frankfurt Critical School and Ivan Illich for the analysis of modern society. Of these, 12 unique concepts belonging to Ivan Illich have been identified and defined. Additionally, Ivan Illich's language and rhetoric were examined and found to be compatible with his discourse. As a result of all this review, it has been found that Ivan Illich's discourse, which focuses on the criticism of modern social institutions, has the characteristics that a sociological theory should have.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agamben, G. (2005). The time that remains - a commentary on the letter to the Romans. (ed.) Werner Hamacher, P. D. (trans.), Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619869

Anderson B. C. (2022, February) The genius of Ivan Illıch. https://www.firstthings.com/article/2022/02/the-genius-of-ivan-Illich

Bağce, H. E. Ed. (2013). Sunuş. (iç.) Frankfurt Okulu. Doğu Batı.

Beck, H. (2016). Otra modernidad es posible: el pensamiento de Ivan Illich. Malpaso.

Benjamin, W. (2014). Pasajlar. A. C. (çev.), YKY.

Best, S. & Kellner, D. (2011). Postmodern teori – eleştirel soruşturmalar. M. K. (çev.), Ayrıntı.

Bookchin, M. (1999). Toplumu yeniden kurmak. Metis.

Casagrande, L. & Coradini de Freitas, N. (2020). Organizing in the age of systems: Ivan Illich’s critical contributions to organization studies. Cadernos EBAPE.BR 18(2), Apr-Jun 2020. 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395177954x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395177954x

Cayley, D. (2005). The rivers north of the future - the testament of Ivan Illich as told to David Cayley. House of Anansi.

Cayley, D. (2018). Ivan Illich ile söyleşiler. B. İ. D. (çev.), Yeni İnsan.

Cayley, D. (2021). Ivan Illich: An intellectual journey. Pennsylvania State University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271089140

Cole, S. Ed. (2001). What’s wrong with sociology? Transaction.

Cooley, A. (t.y.). Ivan Illich - Austrian philosopher and priest. [encyclopedia item] Encyclopaedia Britannica. Ekim 25, 2023 de https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ivan-Illich den erişildi.

Cyr, G. (1990). An analysis and evaluation of Ivan Illich's social and educational philosophy in the light of his early development and the major critiques of his theories. [Unpublished master dissertation]. Mcgill University. https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/0k225c187

Esteva, G. (2015). Time to enclose the enclosers with Marx and Illich. The International Journal oflllich Studies. 4(1). September 11, 2015. 70-96.

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. (in) Teun A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction - Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, Volume 2. Sage. 258-285.

Foucault, M. (2014a). Özne ve iltidar. I. E. & O. A. (çev.), Ayrıntı.

Foucault, M. (2014b). Kliniğin doğuşu – Tıbbi algının arkeolojisi. Ş. Ü. (çev.), Epos.

Fromm, E. (1970). Introduction. (In) Ivan Illich, Celebration of awareness - A call for institutional revolution. Anchor Books. vii-x.

Gabbard, D. A. (1993) Silencing Ivan Illich: a Foucauldian analysis of intellectual exclusion. Rowman & Littlefield.

Geuss, R. (2002). Eleştirel teori – Habermas ve Frankfurt Okulu. F. K. (çev.), Ayrıntı.

Gruen, N. (2021, November 2) Practical steps towards Ivan Illich’s world. https://clubtroppo.com.au/2021/11/02/practical-steps-towards-ivan-illichs-world/

Habermas, J. (1981) Modernity versus postmodernity. S. B.-H. (trans.), New German Critique, 22, Special Issue on Modernism. Winter 1981, 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/487859

Habermas, J. (1993). İdeoloji olarak teknik ve bilim. M. T. (çev.), YKY.

Habermas, J. (2001a). İletişimsel eylem kuramı – C1: Eylem rasyonelliği ve toplumsal rasyonelleşme. M. T. (çev.), Kabalcı.

Habermas, J. (2001b). İletişimsel eylem kuramı – C2: İşlevselci aklın eleştirisi üzerine. M. T. (çev.), Kabalcı.

Haldane, J. B. S. (1927). On being the right size. (in.) Possible Worlds and Other Essays. Chatto and Windus. 18-26.

Hartch, T. (2015). The prophet of Cuernavaca: Ivan Illich and the crisis of the west. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204563.001.0001

Herrera, L. R. P. (2022). Reseñas Y Comentarios Bibliográficos: Beck, Humberto (2016). Otra modernidad es posible. El pensamiento de Iván Illich. México: Malpaso. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 37(1), 109, enero-abril, 2022, 347-353 http://dx.doi.org/10.24201/edu.v37i1.2128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v37i1.2128

Hine, D. (2023). At work in the ruins: finding our place in the time of science, climate change, pandemics and all the other emergencies. Chelsea Green.

Horkheimer, M. (2005). Geleneksel ve eleştirel kuram. M. T. (çev.), YKY.

Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T.W. (2014). Aydınlanmanın diyalektiği. N. Ü. & E. Ö. K. (çev.), Kabalcı.

Hutchins, R. M. & Adler, M. J. Eds. (1970). Preface to Ivan Illich’s article “The need for cultural revolution”. (in) The great ideas today 1970 - Featuring a symposium: the idea of revolution - Encyclopaedia Britannica. William Benton. 28-44.

Illich, I. (1970). Celebration of awareness - A call for institutional revolution. Anchor.

Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. Penguin.

Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row.

Illich, I. (1974). Energy and equity. Calder & Boyars.

Illich, I. (1975). Medical nemesis - the expropriation of health. Calder & Boyars.

Illich, I. (1977). Disabling Professions. (in.) Illich, I. (ed.) (2010). Disabling Professions. Marion Boyars. 11-40.

Illich, I. (1978a). The right to useful unemployment and its professional enemies. Marion Boyars.

Illich, I. (1978b). Toward a History of Needs. Pantheon.

Illich, I. (1981). Shadow work. Marion Boyars. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82611

Illich, I. (1982). Gender. Pantheon.

Illich, I. (1985). H2O and the waters of forgetfulness. Heyday.

Illich, I. (1989). Şenlikli toplum. A. K. (çev.), Ayrıntı.

Illich, I. (1992a). Enerji ve eşitlik. U. U. (çev.), Ağaç.

Illich, I. (1992b) In the mirror of the past - lectures and addresses 1978-1990. Marion Boyars.

Illich, I. (1993). In the vineyard of the text - a commentary to Hugh’s didascalicon. The University of Chicago Press.

Illich, I. (1996). Gender. A. F. (çev.), Ayraç.

Illich, I. (1997). The wisdom of Leopold Kohr. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 17(4), 157-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769701700403

Illich, I. (2000). Tüketim köleliği. M. K. (çev.), Pınar.

Illich, I. (2007). H2O ve unutmanın suları. L. B. (çev.), Yeni İnsan.

Illich, I. (2010a). İşsizlik hakkı. D. K. (çev.), Yeni İnsan.

Illich, I. (2010b). Needs. (in.) Sachs, W. (ed.) (2010). The development dictionary - a guide to knowledge as power. Zed Books. 95-111.

Illich, I. (2011). Sağlığın gaspı – medical nemesis. S. S. (çev.), Ayrıntı.

Illich, I. (2013a). Okulsuz toplum. M. Ö. (çev.), Şule.

Illich, I. (2013b). Gölge iş. D. K. (çev.), Yeni İnsan.

Illich, I. (2019). Geçmişin aynasında - ders ve konuşma notları 1978-1990. Yeni İnsan.

Illich, I. & Sanders, B. (1988). ABC - Alphabetization of the Popular Mind. North Point.

Illich, I. & Sanders, B. (2015). ABC - Aklın modernleşmesi. Ü. Ş. (çev.), Yeni İnsan.

Jacobsen, M. H. & Tester, K. (2014). Giriş. (in.) Bauman, Z. (2014). Sosyoloji ne işe yarar? Ayrıntı. 11-16.

Kahn, R. & Kellner, D. (2007). Paulo Freire and Ivan Illich: technology, politics and the reconstruction of education, Policy Futures in Education, 5(4), 2007, 431-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.431

Kaller-Dietrich, M. (2011). Vita di Ivan Illich. Il pensatore del novecento più necessario e attuale. Edizioni dell’Asino.

Kızılçelik, S. (2015). Çağdaş sosyoloji kuramları. Atatürk Üniversitesi Açiköğretim Fakültesi.

Kohr, L. (1957). The breakdown of nations. Rinehart.

Kung, C. F. (1979). IIlich’s “Learning Web Theory” and its implications for development: for the rural regions of Malaysia. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Loyola University of Chicago. https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2815&context=luc_diss

Layder, D. (2014). Sosyal teoriye giriş. Ü. T. (çev.), Küre.

Lemmerer, E. (2009). Examining a sample of the American-Mexican scientific cooperation in the 1960s: a social network analysis of the CIDOC-network. [Published master dissertation]. University of Vienna. https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/download/o:1260632

Lummis, C. D. (1996). Radical democracy. Cornell University Press.

Macklin, M. (1976). When schools are gone: a projection of the thought of Ivan Illich. University of Queensland Press.

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man; studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon.

Marcuse, H. (1990). Tek boyutlu insan; ileri işleyim toplumunun ideolojisi üzerine. A. Y. (çev.), İdea.

Marshall, G. (1999). Sosyoloji sözlüğü. O. A. & D. K. (çev.), Bilim ve Sanat.

Marvasti, A. B. (2004). Qualitative research in sociology - an introduction. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209700

McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society - community and its counterfeits. BasicBooks.

Mitcham, C. (2003). In memoriam Ivan Illich: critic of professionalized design. Design Issues, 19(4), Autumn 2003. 26-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/074793603322545037

Mitcham, C. (2005). “Illich, Ivan”. Carl Mitcham (ed.), Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics, Volume 2. Thomson Gale. 981-982.

Morrow, R. A. & Torres, C. A. (1995) Social Theory and Education: a critique of theories of social and cultural reproduction. State University of New York Press.

Munoz, J. M. (2016). Ivan Illich and René Girard: The dream of modernity ends. Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture, 23(1), Spring 2016. 155-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14321/contagion.23.1.0155

Mutlu, A. (2008). Ekolojik sorunlara karşı benimsenen yaklaşımlarda yönetim düşüncesi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 41(4), Aralık 2008, 101-123.

NNDB (n. d.). Ivan Illich profile. https://www.nndb.com/people/202/000104887/

Reimer, E. (1971). School is dead - an essay on alternatives in education. Penguin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140862

Robert, J. (1994). Water is a commons. Habitat International Coalition – Mexico.

Rule, J. B. (2001). Dilemmas of theoretical progress. (in.) Cole, S. (ed.) (2001). What’s wrong with sociology? Transaction. 157-172.

Sarıtaş, D. (2018). Modern dünyanın bunalımı karşısında radikal bir eleştiri ve alternatif çözümler: Ivan Illich. Cinius.

Sarıtaş, D. & Bayraktar, L. (2020). Çağın vebası: dejenere olmuş tüketim kültürü, Ivan Illich örneği. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(62), 2049-2058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26449/sssj.2292

Simpson, P. & Mayr, A. (2010). Language and power - a resource book for students. Routledge.

Slattery, M. (2015). Sosyolojide temel fikirler. Ü. T. & G. D. (çev.), Sentez.

Spring, J. (1991). Özgür eğitim. A. E. (çev.), Ayrıntı.

Sözen, E. (1999). Söylem - Belirsizlik, mübadele, bilgi/güç ve refleksivite. Paradigma.

Tamaç, S. (2021). Çağdaş sosyoloji teorileri içinde Ivan Illich’in yeri üzerine bir inceleme. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Mersin Üniversitesi.

Taylor, C. (2005). Foreword. (in.) Cayley, D. (2005). The rivers north of the future - the testament of Ivan Illich as told to David Cayley. House of Anansi. ix-xiv.

Thompson's, D. W. (1917). On growth and form. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11332

Turner, J. F.C. & Fichter, R. Eds. (1972). Freedom to build – dweller control of the housing process. The Macmillan Company.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Introduction: Levels and dimensions of discourse analysis. Teun A. Van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis - Volume 2: Dimensions of Discourse. Academic Press. 1-11.

Verity, J. W. (2011, January 11). The CIDOC social network, analyzed. http://backpalm.blogspot.com/2011/01/cidoc-social-network-analyzed.html

Vukovic, K. P. (2015). Free information: networked learning utopia. Petar Jandric & Damir Boras (eds.), Critical Learning in Digital Networks. Springer. 37-55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13752-0_3

Wallerstein, I. (2012). Tarihsel kapitalizm ve kapitalist uygarlık. N. A. (çev.), Metis.

Weber, M. (1958) The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Published
2023-12-29
How to Cite
Çağlayandereli, M., & Tamaç, S. (2023). A Discourse Analysis on The Theoretical Value of Illichian Discourse . Journal of Applied And Theoretical Social Sciences, 5(4), 326-361. https://doi.org/10.37241/jatss.2023.96